{"id":276,"date":"2003-11-22T10:34:57","date_gmt":"2003-11-22T10:34:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.jmatt.net\/?p=276"},"modified":"2013-11-28T02:41:40","modified_gmt":"2013-11-28T02:41:40","slug":"spam-rage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.redhorse.me\/?p=276","title":{"rendered":"Spam Rage"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I can sympathize with this guy.  A <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wired.com\/news\/culture\/0,1284,61339,00.html\/wn_ascii\" Target=\"Offsite\"><i>Wired<\/i> article<\/a> reports that a Californian has been arrested, and faces a maximum of five  years in jail and a &#36;250,000 fine, for threatening spammers.  Maybe he overreacted a little bit, but the spam problem has gotten so bad that it might be tough to find a jury that would convict him.  It&#8217;s ironic that this story was reported the same weekend that Congress finally passed <a href=\"http:\/\/thomas.loc.gov\/cgi-bin\/query\/D?c108:3:.\/temp\/~c108GFIolH::\" Target=\"Offsite\">anti-spam<\/a> legislation.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>For those (like me) too lazy to read the entire bill, the New York Times has an <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2003\/11\/22\/technology\/22SPAM.html\" Target=\"Offsite\">article<\/a> describing the major features of the legislation.  I thought this law seemed like a good idea when I first read about it (despite the corny CAN-SPAM name), but I&#8217;m beginning to have my doubts.  It looks like it&#8217;s actually going to do very little to stop spam, and, by striking down stricter state laws, it may actually open the doors for more.<\/p>\n<p>\nI&#8217;m sympathetic to the idea of a uniform federal law.  It&#8217;s hard enough to try to regulate the Internet at a national level; state-by-state regulation could get ridiculous.  What state law&#8217;s should apply to an email message? The state where the sender is? The state where the recipient lives? The state where he reads the message, if he&#8217;s travelling? The state where his ISP&#8217;s mail server is located?  In many cases, it would be difficult or impossible for a sender to know where a message might end up, making it hard to ensure compliance with whatever state law might apply.  So a uniform federal law might be better, if it had any teeth. But if it&#8217;s going to strike down all the state laws, it should include many of their protections, and this one doesn&#8217;t look like it does.  The best part of it is the do-not-email registry, and that&#8217;s not even a requirement, just a suggestion.<\/p>\n<p>\nI&#8217;ve gotten more sensitive to the subject of spam.  For a long time, I&#8217;d managed to keep my primary personal email address (the one I give to people I like and trust) free of spam.  One of the advantages of having my own domain is the ability to create new email addresses as needed.  If I create an email address for a special purpose, and it falls into the hands of spammers, I can throw it away with little or no inconvenience.<\/p>\n<p>\nBut within the last couple of weeks, I&#8217;ve started getting dozens of spam messages to my primary address. If I throw that one away and start using a new one, I have to let a bunch of people know, and then worry about lost messages from people I forgot about.  And, no matter how careful I am about who gets the new address, it&#8217;s probably only a matter of time before it starts getting spam, and I don&#8217;t want to keep playing that game.<\/p>\n<p>\nI&#8217;ve avoided using spam filters in the past, for several reasons.  I resent being forced into that by the spammers.  I don&#8217;t want to keep playing the game of trying to figure out what is spam and what isn&#8217;t, and updating the filters as the spammers figure out how to fool them.  I don&#8217;t want to lose legitimate email because it was falsely identified as spam.  Most of the ISP&#8217;s that provide spam filters don&#8217;t allow the customers to customize them; you either accept the ISP&#8217;s definition of spam, or  you turn the filters off.  I don&#8217;t want my email filtered by rules I have no control over.<\/p>\n<p>\nAfter pondering the problem, I think I may have a viable solution.  It doesn&#8217;t involve violent action against the spammers (although if anybody starts a defense fund for that guy in California, I&#8217;ll contribute).  Watch this space for reports on how it works out.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I can sympathize with this guy. A Wired article reports that a Californian has been arrested, and faces a maximum of five years in jail and a &#36;250,000 fine, for threatening spammers. Maybe he overreacted a little bit, but the spam problem has gotten so bad that it might be tough to find a jury&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/blog.redhorse.me\/?p=276\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Spam Rage<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-276","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-geekstuff","entry"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9mOtr-4s","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.redhorse.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/276","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.redhorse.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.redhorse.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.redhorse.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.redhorse.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=276"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.redhorse.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/276\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.redhorse.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=276"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.redhorse.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=276"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.redhorse.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=276"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}